Correction and Withdrawal Policy

The Journal of Energy, Agriculture, and Environmental Science (JEAES) is dedicated to upholding the integrity of the scientific record while ensuring the publication of high-quality research. The journal policy follows the standard protocols for managing errors found in published articles and the situations that may lead to the correction, retraction, or withdrawal of these articles. This policy specifies the protocols for managing errors found in published articles and the situations that may lead to the correction, retraction, or withdrawal of these articles. The journal is committed to maintaining confidentiality during the investigation, except in situations where public disclosure is obligatory or legal measures must be taken.

Article Correction

We are dedicated to maintaining the accuracy and honesty of the research we publish, and the online version of an article is regarded as the definitive and complete edition. We acknowledge that errors can occasionally arise, despite the dedicated work of our authors, reviewers, and editors. Although we have the capability to revise every version of our articles, our policy, however, does not allow for this, except in a few exceptional cases. A correction of an article may be published if a significant error is identified, particularly concerning scientific accuracy, or if it could potentially impact the author's reputation or that of our journal. Corrections to published articles are accepted for inaccuracies in data or calculations that have a substantial effect on the results or conclusions of the article, for textual presentation errors that influence interpretation, and for mistakes in the attribution of sources or authorship that compromise the integrity of the article. We will not publish corrections that do not have a significant impact on the contribution or that do not greatly impair the reader's understanding, such as spelling mistakes or grammar errors. Upon special request, we can only amend typographical errors in the following areas: article titles, author names, affiliations, keywords, and abstracts. In order to amend a published article, the author is required to compose an email to the editorial team. This email should contain the title of the article, the names of the authors, the DOI or URL, and a detailed description of the error and its consequences for the conclusions of the article. The editor will assess the request and, if required, confer with the authors and reviewers. If the error is recognized as significant, a correction notice will be released. This policy on article corrections may change. Authors will be informed of any such changes. It is our conviction that transparency and accountability are fundamental to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity.

There are four main categories of corrections applicable to peer-reviewed content: publisher correction (erratum), author correction (corrigendum), addendum, and retraction. An erratum is issued to alert readers about a significant mistake made by the publishing or journal staff, typically a production error, which adversely affects the publication record, the scientific integrity of the article, or the reputation of the authors and the journal. Erratas are not issued for typographical mistakes unless they are deemed significant. In cases of substantial errors in figures or tables, a revised version will be provided, and republishing will occur only if the editor considers it essential. A corrigendum is issued to inform readers of a significant error committed by the authors that negatively affects the publication record, undermines the scientific integrity of the article, or tarnishes the reputation of the authors and the journal. All authors are required to sign a corrigenda before their work is published. In cases where co-authors have differing opinions, the editors will seek the input of independent peer reviewers and implement the required changes, while also acknowledging the dissenting author(s) in the final published document. An addendum serves as a supplementary addition to the article by its authors, intended to clarify inconsistencies, enhance the existing content, or provide updates and explanations regarding the information presented in the primary work. Addenda are released on rare occasions and solely when the editors conclude that the addendum is vital for the reader's understanding of an important segment of the published material. The determination of whether to issue a correction is the responsibility of the editor(s) of a journal, who may consult with advisory board members, reviewers, or editorial board members for guidance. The handling editors will initiate communication with the authors of the affected paper to seek clarification. The final determination on whether a correction is needed and the nature of that correction is the responsibility of the editors. After correction, an announcement regarding the correction will be released, which will encompass the revised information, indicate the location of the correction in the article, and offer an explanation for the error. The original article will undergo an update that includes a link to the correction notice. A correction PDF will be added to the original article PDF, ensuring that the published version of the article remains intact. As a result, readers who download the PDF will access both the original article and the corrections. The correction will be communicated to the indexing services and databases for proper updating.

Article Retraction

A retraction of an article can happen in cases where a significant error, such as in the methodology or analysis, undermines the conclusions of the article or when there is evidence of research or publication misconduct that has occurred. Retraction is warranted in cases where there is clear evidence of plagiarism, findings that are unreliable due to misconduct or a genuine error, or when results have been published without appropriate citation or justification. Additional factors that may lead to retraction encompass issues related to authorship, instances of multiple submissions, fraudulent data usage, manipulation of images, unethical research practices, or violations of editorial guidelines. Article retraction may take place as a result of compromised peer review processes, the author's failure to address concerns or inquiries related to their work, an inability to verify findings, the absence of raw data or images, or a lack of evidence that the authors performed the research themselves. Prior to making a decision, a complete investigation will be performed by the editorial staff in collaboration with the editorial team. Authors have the option to request the retraction of their articles if they believe their rationale aligns with the necessary criteria for retraction. Retractions are implemented to amend the academic record and should not be viewed as punitive measures against the authors. Any third party may initiate a retraction by providing evidence of misconduct; in such instances, the editorial board will conduct a thorough investigation into the allegations. When a retraction is found to be necessary, an online notice will be released, featuring the article's title, the author's name, the publication date, and a link directing to the original article. The notification will outline the rationale for the retraction, providing specifics regarding the misconduct or inaccuracies, and may also feature a statement from the authors. The original article will continue to be available online, but it will be distinctly labeled as retracted. Notification of the retraction decision will be sent to the authors and they have the chance to provide their response. All co-authors will be requested to consent to a retraction. Should any co-authors refuse to endorse the retraction; the editors retain the right to issue the retraction, clearly identifying the dissenting author(s).

Article Withdrawal Policy

This policy regarding withdrawals is designed to permit authors to remove their manuscripts from consideration if they choose not to proceed with publication. Authors may choose to withdraw their manuscripts at any moment before the manuscript receives acceptance for publication. In order to withdraw a manuscript, the author must provide a written request directed to the editorial office. The request should be presented in a formal email format and must contain the following details: the reason for the withdrawal, the title of the manuscript, and the name(s) of the author(s). Following this, the editorial office will review the request and notify the author of their decision. After a manuscript is withdrawn, it will no longer be eligible for publication in the journal. There will be no fee applied for withdrawals. The withdrawal policy is not applicable to manuscripts that have received acceptance for publication. If an author decides to withdraw a manuscript after it has been accepted for publication, the author might be required to pay the complete article processing charge (APC). It is important to safeguard the integrity of the peer-review process. Withdrawing a manuscript after publication online is a grave concern and will be taken into account solely in exceptional situations like ethical violations, serious misconduct, or duplicate publication. Withdrawal refers to the process of removing the article's content, including both the HTML and PDF formats, along with a PDF document indicating that the article has been officially withdrawn. Changes may occur in the withdrawal policy. Authors are encouraged to regularly check the journal's website for the most recent updates on the withdrawal policy. Authors can initiate an appeal regarding a decision on retraction or withdrawal; they may do so by contacting the editorial office. If you have any concerns regarding this policy or would like to talk about a potential withdrawal, do not hesitate to contact the editorial office at [email protected]

Expressions of Concern

A formal expression of concern may be considered when significant issues are identified in an article but yet the investigation for those issues yields inconclusive results or is postponed due to complexities. This situation could arise from ongoing institutional inquiries or other factors that are outside the journal's control. After the investigation has been finalized, a retraction or correction notice may be published alongside the expression of concern, with the original article remaining a permanent part of the publication record. Expressions of concern may be considered when there is ambiguous evidence of misconduct in research or publication by the authors, limited collaboration from the authors' institutions, well-founded apprehensions regarding the reliability of findings, an investigation that is not conducted fairly or impartially, or an ongoing investigation that fails to adequately address the concerns raised. An expression of concern will always be directly linked to the corresponding published article.

Article Removal

In exceptional cases, it may become necessary to remove an article from the online journal. This situation will arise solely in instances where the article is evidently defamatory or encroaches upon the legal rights of individuals, or when the article is, or is likely to become, the subject of a court order, or where acting on the article could pose a significant health risk. Under these conditions, the metadata, including the title and authors, will remain accessible online; however, the content of the article will be substituted with a notice stating that it has been removed due to legal reasons.

Article Replacement

Should an article present a significant health risk upon its application, the authors of the original work may decide to retract the flawed publication and issue a corrected version to ensure accuracy. In such situations, the aforementioned procedures for retraction will be implemented, with the distinction that the notice of article retraction will include a link to the corrected and republished article, along with a history of the document.