Reviewers Guidelines:
>>> Submitted manuscripts undergo evaluation by a minimum of two reviewers, each of whom possesses expertise in the relevant field, adhering to the principles of double-blind refereeing. The journal employs a double-blind peer review process, which guarantees that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to one another.
>>> Each submission to this journal will be subjected to a thorough screening and evaluation process to assess its relevance to the journal's scope, academic quality, and alignment with advancements in the field.
>>> The editorial board receives suggestions from reviewers concerning the quality of the articles, including whether they necessitate minor or major revisions or if they should be approved or declined. Reviewers are required to report to the editorial board if they discover any conflicts of interest, ethical infractions, or plagiarism associated with the articles.
>>> It is important for reviewers to confirm their availability and interest when responding to a review invitation. Once the reviewer acknowledges the invitations, they are required to fulfill their responsibility of completing evaluations on schedule. It is the responsibility of authors to timely address notifications, including revisions, from the journal.
>>> The reviewer is responsible for assessing and safeguarding all data transmitted to them, adhering to the principles of privacy.
>>> Reviews should be performed in an objective manner, emphasizing the content and quality of the manuscript while eliminating any personal biases or preferences. It is essential for reviewers to deliver clear, constructive, and comprehensive feedback to assist authors in enhancing their manuscripts. Constructive criticism ought to be provided in a manner that is both professional and polite.
>>> Reviewers need to assess whether the manuscript delivers original research and contributes fresh insights or knowledge to the field. Evaluate the importance and potential impact of the research findings on future research.
>>> Reviewers are required to scrutinize the study design, methodology, data collection, and analysis to confirm that they are suitable, strong, and effectively implemented. Reviewers should determine if the methods are explained in adequate detail to facilitate the replication of the study by other researchers.
>>> Reviewers need to confirm that the research follows ethical guidelines, ensuring that all necessary approvals are obtained and ensuring informed consent from all participants involved.
>>> Reviewers are advised to stay watchful for indications of plagiarism, data manipulation, or other forms of research misconduct. It is important to inform the editorial office of any suspicions you may have.
>>> Reviewers must examine the clarity, coherence, and overall readability of the manuscript. They should verify that the arguments are systematically organized and presented in a logical manner. The assessment of the quality and appropriateness of figures, tables, and supplementary materials is the responsibility of the reviewers.
